Comments on: New Scientist in 2002 http://www.br23.net/en/2005/12/18/new-scientist-in-2002/ belarusian perspectives - the two sides of one blogger Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:06:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2 Comment on New Scientist in 2002 by: ghrtyrtyreyt http://www.br23.net/en/2005/12/18/new-scientist-in-2002/#comment-170463 Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:55:42 +0000 http://www.br23.net/en/2005/12/18/new-scientist-in-2002/#comment-170463 <strong>ghrtyrtyreyt</strong> ghrtyrtyreyt ghrtyrtyreyt

ghrtyrtyreyt

]]> Comment on New Scientist in 2002 by: }T{Reme [Q_G] http://www.br23.net/en/2005/12/18/new-scientist-in-2002/#comment-205 Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:01:57 +0000 http://www.br23.net/en/2005/12/18/new-scientist-in-2002/#comment-205 Interesting magazine :) Yes I do too find it amusing to occasionally bump into some old document making theories about the future, part of it ends up being true :) They were "sorry" eh? Well.. I dunno but according to most law books.. he can sue the police / government for unjustified detention. Any reasonable lawyer would pulverize any form of arguments the police may have for keeping him detained. They had no reason to do so, period. Interesting magazine :) Yes I do too find it amusing to occasionally bump into some old document making theories about the future, part of it ends up being true :)

They were “sorry” eh? Well.. I dunno but according to most law books.. he can sue the police / government for unjustified detention. Any reasonable lawyer would pulverize any form of arguments the police may have for keeping him detained. They had no reason to do so, period.

]]>